Case Study Analysis Method

How can you function and create scale in that situation? Sam Zell, case study answer billionaire real estate investor, told CNBC in 2013. I dont understand how anyone can computer screen thousands of houses. When case study solution new rental companies started offering shares to investors on case study answer public market in late 2012, case study solution response was tepid. But housing trends were on case study solution side of case study answer buyers: America was becoming a renter nation. According to census data, between 2007 and 2017, case study solution United States added less than 1 million households in owner occupied homes, but 6. 5 million in renter occupied homes. Resolution 2013 05 Regarding Literary Braille Certification for Professionals Working with case study solution Blind WHEREAS, investigation many times shows that blind people who use Braille on daily basis are way more likely to be a success in neighborhood life and to find high paid employment, making a normal of $11,000 more per year than employed blind those who do not use Braille; and WHEREAS, in accordance with a 2011 survey carried out by case study answer Institute on Blindness at Louisiana Tech University, only 37 percent of working age blind adults nationwide are presently employed full time; and WHEREAS, this dismal employment statistic is unlikely to increase due to the fact too many blind and visually impaired scholars exit their school systems without literacy skills, since only 10 % of todays blind students under age twenty two acquire guide in Braille as their primary reading medium; and WHEREAS, mavens hired by school districts or public or inner most rehabilitation businesses charged with case study solution duty of coaching case study solution studying and writing skills linked to case study answer Braille code to either infants or adults do not currently must meet a national common to certify that they themselves can read and write Braille; and WHEREAS, each college expert preparatory program establishes its own arbitrary standards for meeting levels of Braille proficiency, and, while some courses are rigorous, others are lax of their expectations of scholar Braille competency; and WHEREAS, criteria even within genuine university professional preparatory courses differ based upon case study solution features of case study answer individual coaching Braille courses, which consequences in graduates having a wide range of Braille skill levels; and WHEREAS, case study answer National Blindness Professional Certification Board presently administers case study solution National Certification in Literary Braille NCLB test, a five year renewable certification; and WHEREAS, case study solution NCLB test is case study solution only exam mainly designed to evaluation those who teach Braille studying and writing, and it’s been independently validated by a third party to measure case study answer competency of case study answer test takers; and WHEREAS, valid national standards are case study solution only constant strategy of assuring employers, school directors, colleagues, patrons, families, and other mavens that blindness mavens own compatible Braille information and talents; and WHEREAS, under case study solution management of case study answer National Federation of case study solution Blind, a set of businesses adding case study answer American Council of case study answer Blind, case study answer American Foundation for case study answer Blind, case study answer Association for Education and Rehabilitation of case study answer Blind and Visually Impaired, case study answer Blinded Veterans Association, case study solution Canadian Council of case study solution Blind, case study solution Canadian National Institute for case study answer Blind, and case study solution National Library Service for case study answer Blind and Physically Handicapped came together and at last developed case study solution NCLB test: Now, hence, BE IT RESOLVED by case study answer National Federation of case study answer Blind in Convention assembled this fifth day of July, 2013, in case study solution city of Orlando, Florida, that this association strongly urge all college classes that arrange mavens to work with case study answer unaware of adopt case study answer NCLB test as case study solution exit criterion or comprehensive exam for all academics of case study solution blind and visually impaired; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that we urge case study answer US Department of Education, all state departments of education, all school districts, and all public and personal businesses that work with case study answer ignorant of adopt case study answer NCLB test as case study solution gold common for all people who find themselves hired to coach Braille reading and writing, in order to offer equality, consistency, and defense to all consumers, assuring that they are receiving workout by instructors who’ve verified a constant common of Braille competency; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this association urge that every one blindness businesses that were involved in case study solution advent of case study solution NCLB test vigorously promote it as a necessary certification for all experts running with blind infants or adults in case study answer reading and writing of case study solution Braille code. Resolution 2013 06 Regarding case study solution Technology, Education and Accessibility in College and Higher Education Act WHEREAS, case study solution integration of generation in case study answer academic sphere has fundamentally altered case study answer teaching and studying tactics, allowing curricular content once accessible only in textbooks and through lectures to be disseminated through electronic books, web content material, digital library databases, sophisticated application, and mobile functions; and WHEREAS, this intersection of era and schooling creates chance to expand case study solution circle of participation by print disabled scholars and allows common access to mainstream academic merchandise for all students; and WHEREAS, in case study answer 2008 reauthorization of case study answer Higher Education Opportunity Act, Congress approved a commission, case study solution Advisory Committee on Accessible Instructional Materials for Students with Disabilities in Postsecondary Education AIM Commission, to look at case study answer status of available educational era in postsecondary schooling; and WHEREAS, in 2011 case study solution AIM Commission posted its report, finding that manufacturers have didn’t include accessibility solutions for their merchandise; institutions have didn’t cut case study solution impact of inaccessible technology on their disabled students; and, because of this proliferation of inaccessible elements, blind and other print disabled scholars experience a number of demanding situations including blocked access to enrollment and educational opportunities; and WHEREAS, in case study answer five years between case study solution AIM Commissions authorization and case study answer issuance of its report, era has advanced rapidly, developing more and more leading edge solutions for accessibility and whole participation; and WHEREAS, case study solution Commissions findings show that brands and institutions of better schooling have absolutely did not take benefit of this chance and are perpetuating case study solution separate but equal method to schooling; and WHEREAS, this missed chance and common inaccessibility in case study answer academic sphere have put huge, pointless burdens on blind and other print disabled scholars, a fact illustrated by case study solution findings of case study solution AIM Commission report; and WHEREAS, in a 2010 Dear Colleague letter addressed to all presidents of institutions of higher education, case study answer US Department of Education and case study answer US Department of Justice asserted that equal access to technology in case study answer lecture room is a civil right assured by Section 504 of case study solution Rehabilitation Act and case study solution Americans with Disabilities Act; and WHEREAS, case study answer condition of inaccessible technology in school classrooms has not more advantageous since case study answer 2010 Dear Colleague letter or case study answer publishing of case study solution AIM Commission Report in 2011, demonstrating that more action must be taken in order to remedy this difficulty; and WHEREAS, generation exists to make digital academic constituents and their delivery programs fully available, but most postsecondary associations are claiming that technology is too pricey, while manufacturers are saying there is no demand for it; and WHEREAS, case study solution AIM Commission report recommends correcting this issue with case study solution development of accessibility guidelines for educational parts, which might provide assistance to manufacturers and serve as standards for postsecondary associations, ensuring that each one items can be fully reachable to blind and print disabled scholars; and WHEREAS, in response to this advice case study solution National Federation of case study solution Blind has drafted model law called case study solution Technology, Education and Accessibility in College and Higher Education Act TEACH, which calls on case study solution US Access Board to grow accessibility guidelines for instructional elements used in postsecondary schooling and then calls for case study answer Department of Justice to establish those checklist as enforceable criteria under case study answer Americans with Disabilities Act laws; and WHEREAS, case study answer model language of TEACH has been endorsed by case study answer American Association of People with Disabilities, case study solution National Association of case study solution Deaf, case study solution National Council on Independent Living, case study answer Association of American Publishers, and 7 other companies; and WHEREAS, senior members of case study solution House Education and Workforce Committee and Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee have shown significant attention in case study answer bill but have yet to commit fully to being sponsors or introducing case study solution bill: Now, hence, BE IT RESOLVED by case study answer National Federation of case study answer Blind in Convention assembled this fifth day of July, 2013, in case study answer city of Orlando, Florida, that this organization strongly urge case study solution United States House of Representatives and case study solution United States Senate to introduce and pass case study answer Technology, Education and Accessibility in College and Higher Education Act to protect case study answer civil rights of blind and print disabled scholars fully and to put a stop to case study solution separate method to education it truly is continually and unnecessarily perpetuated by inaccessible academic technology. Resolution 2013 07 Regarding Declining Productivity for Blind Users of Microsoft Office WHEREAS, for more than a decade case study solution Microsoft Office suite of program has been an a must-have productiveness tool for blind users of case study answer Windows working system who perform tasks akin to word processing, e mail, spreadsheet introduction and editing, and database management; and WHEREAS, in many employment settings, blind and sighted employees alike are required to use Microsoft Office courses to carry out their work; and WHEREAS, blind users of case study answer Windows operating system who rely upon screen access generation for impartial access to case study answer computer use case study answer keyboard to tell personal computer courses what to do; and WHEREAS, as each new edition of Microsoft Office has been released, case study answer variety of keystrokes had to carry out some tasks has greater, as illustrated by case study solution following examples: With case study answer liberate of Outlook 2007, case study solution minimum variety of keystrokes required to insert a signature or an attachment went from two to 3. In Microsoft Word 2013, case study solution latest edition to be released, it is no longer possible to press shortcut keys corresponding to ALT+A or ALT+I to act upon a word that has been flagged by case study solution spell checker; instead, case study answer user must tab many times until case study solution suitable button has got focus and then press case study solution Enter key. In Microsoft Word 2013 case study solution basic Open and Save As dialogs are available only by drilling down via another dialog or by using various, less famous keystrokes; and WHEREAS, considered for my part, each task that calls for an additional keystroke may not seem huge, but, taken in combination, all of those tasks bring about an overall productiveness drain for person who uses keyboard shortcuts instead of case study answer mouse; and WHEREAS, while case study solution Microsoft Corporation conducts extensive market research and reports to maximize case study answer capability of classic mouse users to be efficient using its software, it has historically done nothing to develop more efficient approaches and strategies to escalate case study answer speed and effectivity of keyboard only users of its classes; and WHEREAS, case study solution Microsoft Corporation, a self proclaimed supporter of accessibility for folk with disabilities for more than two many years, must have built enough familiarity with case study answer blind group and case study solution screen access era used by case study solution ignorant of have in mind case study answer importance of case study solution keyboard and case study answer critical wish to ensure greatest productivity for keyboard only users; and WHEREAS, as important as it is to examine what a specific object on case study solution screen is i. e.